On this page
- Why keys matter more than title
- The custody and control chain
- Choosing a custody method
- Recovery and succession
- Valuation and records
- Deed provisions specific to digital property
- Checks on the origin of the assets
- Why separation matters if something goes wrong
- What this service does not cover
- What the confidential assessment can establish
- Frequently asked questions
A trustee crypto assets trust arrangement stands or falls on one practical point: who can actually move the assets. In a trust, title sits in the trustee's name and the assets form a separate fund, but a crypto holding has no register entry to say so. Whoever holds the private keys holds the power to transfer. This page looks only at the trustee's work: custody, control of keys, valuation and records.
It is general information, not advice. The right set-up depends on the kind of asset, the trust deed and the people involved, which is why it starts with an individual analysis.
Why keys matter more than title
The Hague Trusts Convention describes a trust as assets placed under a trustee's control, held as a distinct fund with title in the trustee's name, and managed and accounted for by the trustee. For a bank account or a property, the register or the bank confirms that position. For crypto assets, nothing external does.
Three consequences follow:
- If the settlor still holds the only copy of the keys, the trustee may be a trustee in name only.
- If one employee of a provider holds them, the assets depend on that person.
- If nobody can recover them, the assets can be lost without any wrongdoing.
Example: a family established in Lausanne transfers a wallet into a discretionary trust. The founder keeps the seed phrase in a drawer "just in case". The trust deed says the trustee controls the assets, yet in practice the founder still does. A trustee would treat that as a gap to close at the outset. For the wider question of what a trustee must be able to show, see what a trustee owes the beneficiaries.
The custody and control chain
A sound arrangement can be described as a chain. Each link has an owner, and the trustee should be able to point to who holds it.
Choosing a custody method
There is no single correct answer. The choice depends on size, activity, the types of asset and the trustee's own organisation. The trustee compares options on control, recovery, cost of operation and the quality of the provider.
| Criterion | Regulated custodian | Own infrastructure under dual approval |
|---|---|---|
| Who holds the keys | The custodian, for the trustee | The trustee and named co-signers |
| Recovery | Set by the custodian's procedures | Set by the trustee's written procedures |
| Main risk | Dependence on one provider | Operational error or lost signer |
| Evidence of control | Statements and contracts | Signing policy, logs and test records |
| Suited to | Simple, long-term holdings | Active or unusual holdings |
Example: a founder in Zurich wants a wallet to need two separate approvals before any transfer. One approval sits with the trustee, the other with a second authorised person at the trustee's firm. Neither can act alone, and the policy says who steps in if one is unavailable. The trustee can then show how control works, which matters if a beneficiary or a supervisor asks.
If a protector holds a power over the assets, the trustee also needs to know how that power meets the signing rules. See working with a protector.
Recovery and succession
Control that cannot be recovered is a risk. The trustee therefore writes down:
- where backups are kept, and who can reach them;
- what happens if a signer dies, leaves or is incapacitated;
- how a successor trustee would receive control; and
- how often the procedure is tested.
This links to continuity planning when the trustee is not there and to the handover steps in changing trustee step by step.
Valuation and records
Digital assets move in value and can be held across several addresses or platforms. The trustee keeps a record that allows the trust to be accounted for at any point. In practice that means:
- a list of holdings by asset and address;
- the date and source used for each valuation;
- a log of transfers and who approved them; and
- supporting documents kept with the trust file.
Under the Swiss anti-money laundering law (AMLA, GwG), trustees covered by the Financial Institutions Act (FinIA, LEFin) are financial intermediaries. Article 7 AMLA requires documents to be drawn up and kept, and Article 8 requires organisational measures. A trustee also has to identify the beneficial owner with due diligence under Article 4 AMLA. For more on what you are entitled to see, read what information your trustee must give you.
Deed provisions specific to digital property
A trust deed written for cash and shares may not work well for crypto assets. The trustee reviews whether the deed:
- permits the holding of digital assets and the use of a custodian;
- sets limits on risk or on trading;
- deals with forks, staking, airdrops and similar events;
- allows the trustee to delegate technical tasks while remaining accountable; and
- fits the powers kept by the settlor. The Convention accepts reserved powers, but the trustee must be able to carry out its duties with them.
Where several vehicles are involved, see a trustee in combined structures.
Checks on the origin of the assets
Before accepting digital assets, the trustee asks where they came from. It verifies the identity of the contracting party under Article 3 AMLA and the beneficial owner under Article 4 AMLA. For crypto assets this often means tracing the path of funds, reviewing exchange statements and obtaining a written declaration. A trustee that cannot satisfy itself on origin may decline the assets. That decision is part of the protection of the trust, not an obstacle to it.
Why separation matters if something goes wrong
Swiss law treats the trust fund as distinct from the trustee's own estate. Under Article 284a of the Debt Enforcement and Bankruptcy Act (DEBA, LP), a claim against the trust assets is brought against a trustee as representative of the trust and continues as bankruptcy limited to those assets. Under Article 284b, if a trustee goes bankrupt, the trust assets are set aside from the estate after deducting the trustee's claims against them. That separation only helps if the assets can be identified, which is one more reason for clear records.
What this service does not cover
The service concerns the trustee's role. It does not provide tax advice for any country, trading advice, or a guarantee of recovery of lost keys. It does not compare jurisdictions. A trustee also does not replace the technical provider; it chooses, supervises and documents.
What the confidential assessment can establish
The assessment can establish who controls the keys today, whether the current custody method matches the trust deed, what records exist, and which gaps need closing. It also shows whether the trustee you have, or are considering, is equipped for this kind of asset. Remuneration depends on the structure and is explained after the confidential assessment. For a broader review, see independent review of an existing trust.
Frequently asked questions
Can a trustee hold crypto assets for a trust?
Yes, if the trust deed allows it and the trustee has the means to control and record them. The trustee must be able to show how control works and how the assets are accounted for.
Who should hold the private keys?
Normally the trustee or a custodian acting for it, under written rules. A settlor who keeps sole control may weaken the trust, depending on the deed and the facts.
Is a custodian safer than managing keys directly?
Neither is safe by nature. A custodian brings dependence on one provider; direct control brings operational risk. The choice depends on the assets and the trustee's organisation.
How are digital assets valued for the trust records?
The trustee records holdings by asset and address, and notes the date and source of each valuation. The method should be consistent from one year to the next.
What happens if a signer is lost or the keys cannot be found?
That is why written recovery procedures exist. They name backups, successors and who may act. No procedure removes the risk entirely, which is a reason to test it.
Can the trustee refuse assets whose origin is unclear?
Yes. As a financial intermediary, a Swiss trustee has to identify the contracting party and the beneficial owner, and may decline assets it cannot verify.
Sources
Considering a trust, or reviewing one?
Describe your situation in a few lines. A Geneva-based trustee reviews it in confidence and replies in writing.